Question: can you expound further on the use/definition of consciousness or will in the sense that they apply to order systems? If I were to Google the term consciousness, something like being aware of one’s surroundings comes up. How does one measure or determine this presence in any ordered system?
The question is in relation to post:
https://transpersonalphilosophy.blogspot.com/2024/01/what-is-volitional-or-volitive-soul.html
This is the very ancient topic of panpsychism (Anima Mundi), which has recently become a scientific theory thanks to information theory. It is defended by Giulio Tononi, who was working with Gerald Edelman (do you remember Edelman?) on various theories about Consciousness. It is an extensive topic but basically the idea is the following: any system capable of integrating information manifests a degree of consciousness, no matter how small that degree may be. It is new only from the narrow traditional point of view of contemporary science, since hunter-gatherer societies have considered that the world is a conscious Being at both an organic and inorganic level. When we have stopped defining Consciousness in terms of alert life and have used the linguistic term of information, we have easily understood that consciousness is not restricted to an animal nutritional integration but that any integration is consciousness.
I attach a link to a documentary that may be useful as an introduction to the matter. As of minute 23, there is talk of Tononi's IIT.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYjnZCy_ZK4&list=PLcX5IdGYTx51I5EGmTgOocAHEAxX5Ir31&index=49&t=1375s
All forms of consciousness that are at a lower level than the organic systems are Volitional Soul, and all forms of basic organic consciousness also express the Volitional Soul in orders and integrations different from those of the inorganic Volitional Soul. According to the doctrine of the Tripartite Soul, there are three types of Soul in the Human Being and in the Universe: Volitive Soul, Emotional Soul and Intellectual Soul.
We are immersed in a continuum of Universal Consciousness.
In response to the last question: It is not a matter of measuring the presence of integration, there is a superstition in relation to the question of scientific measurement that seems difficult to remove. There is a very good essay, I think from the early 70's by the physicist and philosopher of science Thomas Kuhn that was titled: "The Problem of Measurement." A system integrates information if it is capable of increasing its degree of neganthropy (order). In principle, any system in the universe could do it, so there is no need to measure it. Intensionality (gradation of the measurement of a property; do not mistake with intentionality) can be infinitesimal. An infinitesimal gradation of integration would be undetectable.
Comments