Skip to main content

A Quick Note on Religious Separation and Dualism

 

Let me write a somewhat rhapsodic note on the issue, which I hope we will cover in more detail and depth in understanding non-duality in the second chapter of "Path of Beauty".

During the Christian Middle Ages the separation follows the principle of Ratio et Auctoritas. Communication with God is mediated by authority. Auctoritas is founded on Ratio, the priestly knowledge of the proportions that relate the two worlds: authority is the authority of ratio, of reason. It is evident that the practical result is a definitive ecclesiastical control over religious experience that prevents any spiritual flight not sanctioned by its principles.

The continuity of the principle of Speech, of the Logos, which united the poet and the Human in general with Nature - the same that the Pythagoreans saw between the natural world and that of the gods via ideal proportions - is now broken in terms of proportions and unbridgeable distances that alienate Humans in the Universe.

With the words of Thomas Aquinas:

The similarity that is encrypted in the fact that two beings participate in something, or that one has an aptitude for the other, by virtue of which the understanding can come to know one by the other, reduces the distance, but not the similarity that It is based on the convenience of proportions or relationships, since this type of similarity is found in those that are far apart as well as in those that are little far apart: the similarity between two and one, and six and three, is no greater than which is between two and one, and one hundred and fifty. Therefore, the infinite distance that exists between the creature and God does not prevent the aforementioned similarity. (Thomas Aquinas. On Truth. Questions 2. Art.11)

The discussion on this matter can also be brought to the difference between the so-called "external religion" and "internal religion." The first is a form of rational organization of life, practical in relation to the world of experience, necessarily dual. I did an analysis of this in "Mythopoetics". The second, "internal religion," is the liminal experience of the mystic, the encounter with the Numinous, and is not limited by duality or non-duality.

It is interesting to note the great similarities between all forms of "internal religion", whether they be Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, or even the religious forms of Anima Mundi. These similarities are what have led to the postulates of a Perennial Philosophy. It is inevitable that the images of the Numen, of the Divine Liminal, are limitations. If we are talking about an infinite Being, any representation made by any religion, philosophy, creed, thought, is incomplete. In more direct words from the great Andalusian Sufi Ibn Arabi: God Almighty is too great and too immense to be enclosed in one creed to the exclusion of others. He who remains fixed on a "divinity", he draws it only from himself.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Limen et Continuum

  Existence is Encounter. Meeting at the limen. In the limen, the masks disappear, that is, the basic intuitions of identities, such as the identity that I feel and think in relation to the tree that I see in front of me. The identity of the tree is a projection of mine: the unity of my process of perceiving the tree generates a mask in me, the ghost of a limited unity separated from everything else. The simplest form of intuitive understanding of masks and limen is given to us by numbers. Numbers intuitively express the liminal tension that is Existence. A little etymological note. Rythmos in Greek means flow. Arythmos (number) is what does not flow, what remains solidified. Numbers express the liminoid, and flow, rhythm, expresses the liminal. A rhythm becomes liminoid when we can trace patterns in it, that is, when we can construct masks of identities. Mathematics has spoken of flow using the Latin word “continuum”, the continuous. All modern science, since Leibni...

Masks and Ego

  The ego is the force of psychic centroversion, that which establishes points or frames of reference. Without the coordinate point (0,0), we cannot orient ourselves or act. The ego is the force that builds an unlimited number of references, of centers around which different formations of the Soul will appear. In Sanskrit, it is called Ahankara. Aham means “I”, kara is “the process of doing or carrying out”. As a compound word, Ahankara means “the process of making or uttering the ‘I’ ( aham ).” The ego is an action, a force that establishes or says the “I”, that lays a fundamental reference stone with respect to another action. For example, the human organism spontaneously performs the physiological action of seeing, the organ of sight is set in motion automatically, and automatically, a force also appears that assigns another action to the function of vision: the action that says “I ”. The synthesis is “I see.” It also happens in animals, for the acti...

Matriarcal or Uroboric Incest

Let us discuss some basic aspect of ego formation: its appearence out of the uroboric round. The uroboric round is the realm of the primordial waters (you can listen to my Podcast on the Primordial Waters). I really recomend you the book: The Origin s and History of Consciousness by Erich Neumann. (Princeton University Press). Neumann was a friend of Jung and member of the Eranos Group. We could understand the appearance of the ego from the unconscious through the myth of the emergence of an island from the primordial waters. Its appearance, however, is not permanent and definitive, especially at the beginning. The tides of the unconscious rise and the island is once again covered by the waters. Only a progressive systematization of consciousness leads to its permanence. To keep consciousness awake, a force of determination is necessary, which requires a display of psychic and physiological energy. For the appearance of consciousness it is necessary to exert an energy that moves...