Skip to main content

Lightnings. Ramana Maharshi. Different Paths of Reality

 

I do not teach only the doctrine of no birth (ajâta), I approve of all schools. The same truth must be expressed in different ways adapted to the different capacity of the listener. The path of ajâta says: "There is only one reality. There is no birth or death, there is no beginning or end, there is no sâdhaka (one who practices a spiritual path) nor mumuksha (one who seeks truth), nor mukta (liberated one), neither slavery nor liberation. The only thing that exists is the One."

Some find it very difficult to understand this truth and ask: how can we ignore this solid and consistent world that we see around us? They are instructed to focus on the state of dreaming and are told: "Everything you see depends on the one who sees it. Regardless of the one who sees it, nothing is seen." This is the path called drishti-srishtri, or path of perception and creation. In this path it is said that one first mentally creates the world and then sees what his own mind has created. To those who do not understand this way either, it is said: "In the beginning, God created all things."

Comments

Em said…
Oh what a Delightful reimagining of how that final phrase has been interpreted and understood all my life. “In the beginning god created all things”, is this the same as that initial action within me, the spontaneous feeling of Universal Will then? Or rather how I interpret this feeling through my thinking and feeling it then becomes “something” I create? I hope this makes sense.
Great questions, Emily!
The spontaneity of the Volitional Soul, the so-called “Will”, is the spontaneity of Awareness. The image that this Volitive Soul produces in your Emotional Soul and in your Intellectual Soul is the appearance of the world as a Creation-Representation for an observer, for the Subject, that is, for the Awareness-Force. When we say “In the beginning God created all things,” we are distancing ourselves from Awareness, we see it as something alien, and therefore God is something alien from that point of view.
From the point of view of the experience of the “particular human”, from the perspective of the masks, there is a triple unfolding.
1. First we go from “God created” to: “Awareness creates and I am Awareness.”
2. Then, from “Awareness creates and I am Awareness” to: “the created and the creative Awareness are One and the same thing.”
3. Finally, we move on to “I am neither the created nor the creator, the Universe (the Universes), any action-force of Existence, is the shadow of My Essence.”
Em said…
Always a sincere thank you for explaining this over and again in different ways, Oscar. This feels like then, to ask "Who Am I?" is to start with faulty premise of an "I" and then an "Am" as you write in your book. So then, if I ask "What is true?" do I start from a the same faulty premise of a "What" which is a formation made by the "I" and "truth" is...? I have gotten lost inside my own question. haha.

Popular posts from this blog

Limen et Continuum

  Existence is Encounter. Meeting at the limen. In the limen, the masks disappear, that is, the basic intuitions of identities, such as the identity that I feel and think in relation to the tree that I see in front of me. The identity of the tree is a projection of mine: the unity of my process of perceiving the tree generates a mask in me, the ghost of a limited unity separated from everything else. The simplest form of intuitive understanding of masks and limen is given to us by numbers. Numbers intuitively express the liminal tension that is Existence. A little etymological note. Rythmos in Greek means flow. Arythmos (number) is what does not flow, what remains solidified. Numbers express the liminoid, and flow, rhythm, expresses the liminal. A rhythm becomes liminoid when we can trace patterns in it, that is, when we can construct masks of identities. Mathematics has spoken of flow using the Latin word “continuum”, the continuous. All modern science, since Leibni...

Masks and Ego

  The ego is the force of psychic centroversion, that which establishes points or frames of reference. Without the coordinate point (0,0), we cannot orient ourselves or act. The ego is the force that builds an unlimited number of references, of centers around which different formations of the Soul will appear. In Sanskrit, it is called Ahankara. Aham means “I”, kara is “the process of doing or carrying out”. As a compound word, Ahankara means “the process of making or uttering the ‘I’ ( aham ).” The ego is an action, a force that establishes or says the “I”, that lays a fundamental reference stone with respect to another action. For example, the human organism spontaneously performs the physiological action of seeing, the organ of sight is set in motion automatically, and automatically, a force also appears that assigns another action to the function of vision: the action that says “I ”. The synthesis is “I see.” It also happens in animals, for the acti...

Matriarcal or Uroboric Incest

Let us discuss some basic aspect of ego formation: its appearence out of the uroboric round. The uroboric round is the realm of the primordial waters (you can listen to my Podcast on the Primordial Waters). I really recomend you the book: The Origin s and History of Consciousness by Erich Neumann. (Princeton University Press). Neumann was a friend of Jung and member of the Eranos Group. We could understand the appearance of the ego from the unconscious through the myth of the emergence of an island from the primordial waters. Its appearance, however, is not permanent and definitive, especially at the beginning. The tides of the unconscious rise and the island is once again covered by the waters. Only a progressive systematization of consciousness leads to its permanence. To keep consciousness awake, a force of determination is necessary, which requires a display of psychic and physiological energy. For the appearance of consciousness it is necessary to exert an energy that moves...